Going with the army you have
I read as essay a few days ago about how Ronald Reagan would handle the war in Iraq. (Sorry, I can't remember where I read it.) The author contends that unlike Bush, who says he gave his generals the number of soldiers they asked for, Reagan would have insisted that they take more; I'm not sure if that would be under a "more is always better" philosophy, or if Reagan supposedly would have known more about needed troop strength than his generals.
Do we need more troops in Iraq? Would it make a difference?
Do we need more troops in Iraq? Would it make a difference?
<< Home